Carlos Goodall v. United States (order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 99-CO-1063 CARLOS GOODALL, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE. Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges. ORDER (Filed October 19, 2000) The opinion of the court issued on September 28, 2000, is hereby modified in the following respect. On page 9 of the slip opinion, beginning on line 12 of the full paragraph, the remainder of that paragraph shall read: See Holland v. United States, 584 A.2d 13, 15-16 (D.C. 1990) (restitution is a direct consequence of a guilty plea; "Unlike typical examples of 'collateral' matters, . . . restitution . . . is an automatic result of the conviction in that there [is] no subsequent determination in a civil proceeding of the degree or amount of petitioner's liability. The result [is] absolutely part and parcel to the sentence itself."); see also Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 475 F.2d 1364, 1366 (4th Cir.) (consequence is "collateral" if it is not a definite, practical consequence of a defendant's guilty plea), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1005 (1973). PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.