In re Michael R. Gross

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Note to readers: To navigate within this document use the set of icons listed above on the Acrobat toolbar. These opinions are made available as a joint effort by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the District of Columbia Bar. Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 98-BG-161 IN RE MICHAEL R. GROSS, RESPONDENT. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (Submitted May 30, 2000 Decided June 15, 2000) Before SCHWELB and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM: Michael R. Gross is a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia, having been admitted by motion on October 9, 1980. On January 5, 1998, Gross was disbarred by consent by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. On October 8, 1999, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommended that Gross be disbarred in the District of Columbia as reciprocal discipline. Gross did not participate in the proceedings before the Board, nor has he noted an exception to the Board's recommendation. The Office of Bar Counsel has advised us that Bar Counsel likewise does not except to that recommendation. Under these circumstances, we adopt the Board's recommendation, see In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1287 (D.C. 1995), and Michael R. Gross is hereby disbarred. So ordered.1 1 We direct Gross' attention to the requirements of D.C. App. R. XI, ยง 14. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.