Katherine Herbert v. District of Columbia

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Note to readers: To navigate within this document use the set of icons listed above on the Acrobat toolbar. These opinions are made available as a joint effort by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the District of Columbia Bar. No. 93-CV-407 KATHERINE HERBERT, Appellant, CA10776-87 v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL., Appellees. BEFORE: *Wagner, Chief Judge; ***Ferren, *Terry, Steadman, *Schwelb, Farrell, King, **Ruiz, and Reid, Associate Judges. O R D E R (Filed July 31, 1997) On consideration of the petition of appellee, District of Columbia, for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant's response thereto, it is ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 10, 1997, are hereby vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before August 8, 1997. PER CURIAM ** Associate Judge Ruiz has recused herself from this case. *** Associate Judge Ferren has recused himself from consideration petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. of the

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.