Cincunegui v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN CINCUNEGUI, § § § § § § § § § § § Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. No. 57, 2013 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County Cr. ID No. 1104025487 Submitted: March 21, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013 ORDER This 28th day of March 2013, it appears to the Court that, on March 7, 2013, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the Supreme Court filing fee or filing a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this appeal is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.