Harold Grill 2 IRA, et al. v. Chenevert, et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HAROLD GRILL 2 IRA, § Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal § Defendant UNITED § TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § § v. § § LOUIS R. CHÃ NEVERT, JOHN V. § FARACI, JEAN-PIERRE GARNIER, § JAMIE S. GORELICK, EDWARD A.§ KANGAS, ELLEN J. KULLMAN, § MARSHALL O. LARSEN, § RICHARD D. MCCORMICK, § HAROLD MCGRAW III, RICHARD § B. MYERS, H. PATRICK § SWYGERT, ANDRE § VILLENEUVE, CHRISTINE TODD § WHITMAN, and GEORGE DAVID, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees, § and § UNITED TECHNOLOGIES § CORPORATION, § § Nominal Defendant. § No. 390, 2013 Court Below Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware C.A. No. 7999 Submitted: December 18, 2013 Decided: December 19, 2013 Before HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices and CARPENTER, Judge,1 constituting the Court en Banc. 1 Sitting by designation pursuant to Del. Const. art. IV, § 12 and Supr. Ct. R. 2 and 4. ORDER This 19th day of December 2013, the Court, having considered this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties, has determined that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its opinion dated June 24, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.