Epperson v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN EPPERSON, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 389, 2013 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County Cr. ID No. 9408009291 Submitted: October 1, 2013 Decided: November 19, 2013 Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 19th day of November 2013, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss/affirm filed by the appellee, and the appellant s answer to the motion to dismiss and his related motions, the Court finds it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court s order dated June 19, 2013. The Superior Court did not err when summarily dismissing the appellant s nineteenth motion for postconviction relief as procedurally barred under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61. Likewise on appeal the appellant has failed to overcome the procedural hurdles of Rule 61. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee s motion to affirm is GRANTED, and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. All other motions are denied as MOOT. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.