Maddox v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GARY L. MADDOX, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 386, 2013 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex Castle County Cr. ID 0802028998 Submitted: October 2, 2013 Decided: October 14, 2013 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices. ORDER This 14th day of October 2013, after careful consideration of the opening brief, the State s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court s well-reasoned decision dated May 7, 2013. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant s third motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.