King v. Moore

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RYAN W. KING,1 Petitioner BelowAppellant, v. LAUREN MOORE, Respondent BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 377, 2013 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County File No. CN09-02671 Petition No. 12-34839 Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 ORDER This 30th day of September 2013, it appears to the Court that, on September 12, 2013, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 1 The Court sua sponte assigned pseudonyms to the parties by Order dated July 15, 2013. Supr. Ct. R. 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Myron T. Steele Chief Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.