Tribuani v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN A. TRIBUANI, § § § § § § § § § § § Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 346, 2008 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. Cr. ID No. 0610013691 Submitted: July 18, 2008 Decided: September 19, 2008 Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 19th day of September 2008, it appears to the Court that: (1) On July 9, 2008, the Court received John A. Tribuani s untimely notice of appeal from a Superior Court postconviction decision docketed on May 8, 2008. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 6, a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or before June 9, 2008.1 (2) On July 10, 2008, the Clerk issued a notice directing that Tribuani show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.2 In his 1 2 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iii). Del. Supr. Ct. R. 29(b). response to the notice to show cause, Tribuani asserts that the prison mail room was responsible for the delay in filing the appeal. (3) This Court has previously considered and refused to create a separate mailbox rule for prisoners.3 Under Delaware law, a notice of appeal must be received by the Office of the Clerk within the applicable time period to be effective.4 Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to timely file a notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel, an untimely appeal cannot be considered.5 (4) Tribuani does not contend, and the record does not reflect, that his failure to timely file the notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel.6 This case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice 3 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778 (Del. 1989). See id. at 779 (stating that [t]ime is a jurisdictional requirement ); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 5 Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979). 6 See Brown v. State, 2004 WL 1535757 (Del. Supr.) (dismissing untimely appeal after concluding that prison law library personnel are not court-related personnel); Deputy v. Roy, 2004 WL 1535479 (Del. Supr.) (dismissing untimely appeal after concluding that delay in prison mail system cannot enlarge jurisdictional appeal period.). 4 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
