Claycomb v. Playtex Products

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LORNA CLAYCOMB, Plaintiff BelowAppellant, v. PLAYTEX PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 273, 2006 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Kent County C.A. No. 05C-12-035 Submitted: December 1, 2006 Decided: February 6, 2007 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 6th day of February 2007, after careful consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record in this case, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed. The record reflects that appellant filed complaints alleging employment discrimination in both the Superior Court and the federal District Court. Accordingly, the Superior Court did not err in dismissing the state court complaint under the election of remedies provision of 19 Del. C. § 714(c). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/Henry duPont Ridgely Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.