Shufler v. Shufler
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMAL SHUFLER, Respondent BelowAppellant, v. JUDY SHUFLER,1 Petitioner BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 73, 2006 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County File No. CN01-11049 Submitted: March 3, 2006 Decided: March 20, 2006 Revised: April 13, 2006 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER, and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 13th day of March 2006, it appears to the Court that: (1) The respondent-appellant, Jamal Shufler, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Family Court, dated January 10, 2006, which addressed the procedure used for interviewing the parties children. (2) Respondent filed his application for certification to take an interlocutory appeal in the Family Court on January 30, 2006. The Family Court denied the certification application on March 1, 2006. 1 Under Supreme Court Rule 7(d) the names of the parties have been replaced with pseudonyms. (3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal is REFUSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
