Proctor v. Foraker

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RONALD E. PROCTOR, JR., Respondent Below, Appellant, v. HELEN FORAKER, STATE OF DELAWARE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Petitioners Below, Appellees. § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 429, 2005 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Family County File Nos. CK94-3895 ORDER This 13th day of October 2005, it appears to the Court that, on September 21, 2005, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to comply with Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order in this matter. The appellant failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Myron T. Steele Chief Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.