Nevins v. Bryan, et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § § § Plaintiff Below§ Appellant, § § v. § GEORGE BRYAN, DEANWHITLA, § WILLIAM SCHULER, CAROLYN § TINKER, VICKI IRVING, and THE § CENTERFORTHEADVANCEMENT § § OF DISTANCE EDUCATION IN § RURAL AMERICA, a corporation, § § Defendants Below§ Appellees. RAPHAEL F. NEVINS, No. 251, 2005 Court Below-Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 19975 Submitted: August 10, 2005 Decided: October 6, 2005 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices ORDER This 6th day of October 2005, the Court has considered the appellee s motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest on the face of the appellant s opening brief that the appeal is without merit for the reasons stated by the Court of Chancery in its well-reasoned decision dated May 4, 2005, and revised May 17, 2005. We find no error or abuse of discretion on the part of the Court of Chancery. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee s motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.