Woods v. Holden, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DANIEL M. WOODS, Petitioner BelowAppellant, v. DWIGHT HOLDEN, et al., Respondents BelowAppellees. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 143, 2005 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 05M-03-071 Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: September 20, 2005 Before HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices ORDER This 20th day of September 2005, upon consideration of the briefs on appeal and the record below, it appears to the Court that: (1) The petitioner-appellant, Daniel M. Woods, filed an appeal from the Superior Court s March 29, 2005 order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We find no merit to the appeal. Accordingly, we AFFIRM. (2) In 1981, Woods was convicted of Conspiracy in the Third Degree and Criminal Trespass in the Second Degree. He was sentenced to a total of 2 years and 3 months incarceration at Level V. In 1982, Woods was convicted of five counts of Burglary in the Second Degree and one count each of Felony Theft, Misdemeanor Theft, Conspiracy in the Third Degree and Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle. He was sentenced to a total of 14 years incarceration at Level V for those crimes. Between June 1981 and April 1989, Woods was continuously either at Level V incarceration or Level IV work release in connection with these sentences. On April 27, 1989, Woods was released on parole. (3) While on parole, Woods committed new offenses resulting in his convictions of six counts of Burglary in the Second Degree. He was arrested on January 5, 1990 and held in default of bail. On June 1, 1990, he was sentenced to 34 years incarceration at Level V, to be suspended after 30 years for decreasing levels of probation. Woods was incarcerated from January 5, 1990 until September 19, 2002, when he again was released on parole. Woods again committed new offenses, resulting in his re- incarceration on August 10, 2004, where he remains at the present time. (4) On November 10, 2004, the Board of Parole determined that Woods had violated the conditions of his parole and ordered him to serve the remainder of his Level V sentence. The Board also revoked the good time credits previously earned by Woods. On February 9, 2005, Woods was convicted of two additional counts of Burglary in the Second Degree and 2 one additional count of Felony Theft. He was sentenced to 18 years incarceration at Level V, to be suspended after 3 years for probation. (5) In this appeal, Woods claims that the Superior Court should have granted his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that the Board of Parole had no authority to revoke his good time on sentences he already had completed serving. (6) In Delaware, the writ of habeas corpus provides relief on a very limited basis.1 Habeas corpus only provides an opportunity for one illegally confined or incarcerated to obtain judicial review of the jurisdiction of the court ordering the commitment. 2 Habeas corpus relief is not available to [p]ersons committed or detained on a charge of treason or felony, the species whereof is plainly and fully set forth in the commitment. 3 (7) Woods has presented no evidence that the charges against him were not valid on their face or that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the various criminal charges against him. As such, he is not entitled to habeas corpus relief and the Superior Court was correct in so deciding. Hall v. Carr, 692 A.2d 888, 891 (Del. 1997). Id. 3 Id. (quoting Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 6902(1)). 1 2 3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Carolyn Berger Justice 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
