Epperson v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN S. EPPERSON, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 350, 2002 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County Cr.A. Nos. IN94-08-1484 and 1485 Cr. ID No. 9408009291 Submitted: July 17, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, and STEELE, Justices. ORDER This 22nd day of August 2002, after careful consideration of the appellant s opening brief, the State s motion to affirm, and the record, we find it manifest that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated June 12, 2002. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Epperson s motion for postconviction relief was both timebarred and repetitive under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(i)(1), (2). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.