Hayford v. DART, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY SHEILA HAYFORD, Plaintiff, v. DART and DELAWARE TRANSIT CORPORATION, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : C.A. No: K14C-01-024 RBY Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: July 30, 2015 Upon Consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment MOOT ORDER Sheila Hayford, Pro se. Douglas T. Walsh, Esquire, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, Delaware for Defendants. Young, J. Hayford v. Dart, et. al. C.A. No.: K14C-01-024 RBY July 30, 2015 DECISION Having, on this same day, granted Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is MOOT, and is, therefore, DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert B. Young J. RBY/lmc oc: Prothonotary cc: Counsel Sheila Hayford Opinion Distribution 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
