State of Delaware v. Bowersox.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAW ARE E. SCOTT BRADLEY SUSSEX CO UNT Y COU RTHO USE JUDGE 1 The Circle, Suite 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 May 9, 2012 Mark J. Cutrona, Esquire Department of Justice 114 E. Market Street Georgetown, DE 19947 RE: Joseph A. Hurley, Esquire 1215 King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 State v. Wade A. Bowersox Defendant ID No. 1107022570 Dear Counsel: On May 9, 2012, the Court received Mr. Hurley s Motion to Re-Argue, which is a motion seeking to re-argue the Court s decision on Mr. Hurley s Motion to Suppress. It contains no authority or argument as to why the fact-intensive determination made by the Court is wrong. The Court had the benefit of both your pre-hearing memorandum and your post-hearing memorandum. Trial is next Wednesday, May 16, 2012. The case is old, very old. The alleged offense date is July 23, 2011. Indictment was on September 6, 2011. The knock-on-the-door motion seeking re-argument is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Very truly yours, /s/ E. Scott Bradley cc: Prothonotary

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.