Bagwell v. Carroll, et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY NATHANIEL BAGWELL, : C.A. No. 06C-01-014 THG Plaintiff, v. : : THOMAS L. CARROLL, WARDEN; DAVE PIERCE, DEPUTY WARDEN; BETTY BURRIS, DEPUTY WARDEN; PORTER, S/LT. CLASSIFICATION; CINDY ATALLIAN, CLASSIFICATION; JAYME JACKSON, CLASSIFICATION; TODD KRAMER, COUNSELOR; PROFACI, S/LT.; BOONE, LT.; B. WILLIAMS SR. S/LT. HEARING OFFICER; HAZZARD, CAPT.; LARRY SAVAGE, DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER; ANTHONY RENDINA, HEARING OFFICER; WILFRED BECKLES, SGT; FAUST, SGT; MARCELLO T. RISPOLI, S/LT.; RODDEN, LT.; STANLEY TAYLOR, COMMISSIONER OF DELAWARE PRISONS; ROSALIE VARGAS, C/O; TRADER, SGT.; RONNIE DRAKE; HOLMAN, MAJOR; JEFFREY HANSEN, C/O; M. McCREANOR; KENT A. JORDAN, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE; DANYE, NURSE; JANE BRADY, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE; TIM MARTIN, LAW LIBRARIAN; TAYLOR, S/LT.; JENNY HAVEL; CPL.L.M. MERSON; AND VALLIN, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER DISMISSING CASE WHEREAS, plaintiff Nathaniel Bagwell ( plaintiff ) filed a complaint against the abovenamed defendants and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; WHEREAS, by order dated April 20, 2006, this Court denied the motion to proceed in forma pauperis; ruled that plaintiff must pay the filing fee and service fees for the Sheriff on or before May 31, 2006; ruled that plaintiff must provide copies of the complaint and other specified documents for each defendant on or before May 31, 2006; and ruled that unless plaintiff complied with these instructions, then the matter would be dismissed; WHEREAS, plaintiff did not pay the required fees or file the required copies by May 31, 2006; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2006, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED. ____________________________ JUDGE cc: Prothonotary s Office Nathaniel Bagwell Ophelia Waters, DAG

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.