Fleming v. Dionisio
Annotate this CaseThe decedent in this case died when the motorcycle he was operating collided with Defendant’s vehicle. Blood test results indicated that Defendant was intoxicated at the time of the collision. Plaintiff, as the administratrix of the estate of the decedent and in her individual capacity, brought this action against Defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff. The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict, including an award of compensatory and punitive damages to the decedent’s estate and loss of consortium and punitive damages to Plaintiff in her individual capacity. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in (1) admitting expert testimony pertaining to Defendant’s drug use; (2) precluding Defendant from offering evidence as to the full extent of his criminal punishment related to the accident; (3) admitting evidence of Defendant’s postaccident conduct; and (4) failing to strike Plaintiff’s testimony that she intended to fund a charitable scholarship and help her daughter.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.