Santander Bank, N.A. v. Godek
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SANTANDER BANK, N.A. v. ELIZABETH A. GODEK (AC 39007) Lavine, Mullins and Beach, Js. Argued May 17—officially released July 18, 2017 (Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford, Wahla, J. [judgment]; Robaina, J. [motion to open].) Procedural History Action to foreclose a mortgage on certain of the defendant’s real property, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford, where the court, Wahla, J. granted the plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of strict foreclosure and rendered judgment of foreclosure by sale; thereafter, the court, Robaina, J., denied the defendant’s motion to open the judgment, and the defendant appealed to this court. Affirmed. Allison E. Murray, self-represented, the appellant (defendant). Christopher J. Picard, for the appellee (plaintiff). Opinion PER CURIAM. The self-represented defendant in this residential mortgage foreclosure action, Elizabeth A. Godek (also known as Allison E. Murray), appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered against her in favor of the plaintiff, Santander Bank, N.A. On appeal, the defendant appears to raise issues regarding the court’s judgment of foreclosure and its denial of her motion to open. We are unable to discern the analysis of the issues raised on appeal. Nothing that the defendant has written in her appellate briefs persuades us of the existence of any error committed by the trial court, much less reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
