Johnson v. Citizens National Trust and Savings Bank of Los Angelesf

Annotate this Case
[L. A. No. 15080. In Bank. June 29, 1937.]

HAROLD MEAD JOHNSON, Appellant, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a Banking Association), Respondent.

COUNSEL

Earl Curtis Peck, George E. Cloud and A. Richmond for Appellant.

Cosgrove & O'Neil for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

EDMONDS, J.

The appellant in this case is the purchaser of land under a contract made with Harold G. Ferguson Corporation. He later surrendered it for one with Quartz Hill Land and Development Company. [1] He is in exactly the same position as the appellants in the case of Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles, L. A. No. 15079, this day decided (ante, p. 172 [69 PaCal.2d 853]), and the facts are substantially the same in both cases. The cases were tried together and the same principles apply to each.

For the reasons stated in the Hill case the judgment is affirmed.

Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Langdon, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.