Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Annotate this Case
[L. A. No. 16003. In Bank. May 26, 1937.]

LAKEVIEW CREAMERY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Sylvan Y. Allen and Harry C. Hedberg for Petitioners.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, Douglas DeCoster, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Lewis D. Sollings and Amos Friedman for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court, and in particular, Judge Schmidt, to settle a reporter's transcript on appeal. On August 26, 1936, we issued an order to show cause directed to respondents.

[1] Our decision in Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co., L. A. No. 15888 (ante, p. 16 [68 PaCal.2d 968]), this day filed, disposes of the present case.

The petition is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.