Reed v. Norman
Annotate this Case
[L. A. No. 21698. In Bank. May 12, 1953.]
HOYT REED, Appellant, v. CARL O. NORMAN et al., Respondents.
COUNSEL
Hy Schwartz for Appellant.
John Earl Haskins, in pro. per., and Alfred Jay Luke for Respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum
THE COURT.
This appeal presents the same issues as those decided in Reed v. Norman, ante, p. 17 [256 P.2d 930] filed this day, and that decision is controlling herein.
The judgment is reversed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
