Troester v. Starbucks Corporation
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 8/29/18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA DOUGLAS TROESTER, ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) STARBUCKS CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant and Respondent. ) ____________________________________) S234969 9th Cir. No. 14-55530 ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING THE COURT: The opinion herein filed July 26, 2018, is modified as follows: The final paragraph of the majority opinion appearing at 5 Cal.5th 829, 848, is modified to read: We hold that the relevant California statutes and wage order have not incorporated the de minimis doctrine found in the FLSA. We further conclude that although California has a de minimis rule that is a background principle of state law, the rule is not applicable to the regularly reoccurring activities that are principally at issue here. The relevant statutes and wage order do not allow employers to require employees to routinely work for minutes off the clock without compensation. We leave open whether there are wage claims involving employee activities that are so irregular or brief in duration that employers may not be reasonably required to compensate employees for the time spent on them. The petition for rehearing is denied. 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
