Shipman v. Boething Treeland Farms, Inc. (2000)

Annotate this Case
[No. B126426. Second Dist., Div. Six. Mar. 2, 2000.]

[Change in Judgment]

TRENT SHIPMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents, ROBERTO TAMAYO MARTINEZ, Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant.

[Modification of opinion (77 Cal.App.4th 1424).] THE COURT.-It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 7, 2000, be modified in the following particulars:

1. On page 9, the last sentence in the last paragraph is changed so the sentence reads: Costs are awarded to respondents Boething Treeland Farms, Inc., the Boething Family Trust, and Roberto Tamayo Martinez. fn. 4

Add as footnote 4 the following:

FN 4. The opinion title is styled pursuant to the California Style Manual, which drops the designation "respondent" for parties who are both respondents and appellants in a given case due to the existence of a cross-appeal. (Cal. Style Manual (3d ed. 1986) ยง 201 et seq.) Thus, while Martinez is listed as "appellant" in the main opinion title due to his cross-appeal, he is nevertheless also a prevailing respondent in the original appeal.

There is a change in judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.