Pacific Indemnity Company v. Industrial Accident Commission

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 16397. Second Dist., Div. Two. July 13, 1948.]

PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and DOLORES ACEDO, Respondents.

COUNSEL

Herlihy & Herlihy for Petitioner.

T. Groezinger for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

MOORE, P. J.

The facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., et al, No. 16396, ante, p. 726 [195 P.2d 919], this day filed, with the exception that "pieces of windows of the employer's premises" were the instrumentality that directly caused the employee's injuries. Basing the decision herein upon the conclusion derived from the review of cause No. 16396 the writ is discharged and the award is affirmed.

McComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.