Jones v. Meek

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 9760. Second Appellate District, Division Two. April 15, 1935.]

WILLIAM M. JONES, Appellant, v. BURT B. MEEK, as Director of Public Works, etc., et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

William M. Jones, in pro. per., for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, L. G. Campbell, Deputy Attorney-General, and John A. McGilvray for Respondents.

OPINION

Scott, J., pro tem.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the trial court denying a writ of mandate which [6 Cal. App. 2d 194] petitioner sought to secure to compel respondents to reinstate him as a "cashier" or senior clerk under civil service in the state department of motor vehicles.

[1] The trial court found on evidence which is ample and persuasive that petitioner was laid off from the job he had been filling because a lessening in the amount of work had required a reduction in the number of employees; that respondents had not abused their discretion in selecting petitioner for such release, because under the court's finding the latter was held to be the least efficient person so employed, and that temporary work during a period of increased activity in the department was offered to petitioner and by him refused.

We are aware of no authority which requires a department of the state government to retain such an employee, whether under civil service or not, under such circumstances.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Crail, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.