Security First National Bank v. Southern Citrus Association

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 13124. Second Dist., Div. Two. Oct. 14, 1941.]

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Association), Respondent, v. THE SOUTHERN CITRUS ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS, Defendant; A. C. HAUER, Appellant.

COUNSEL

Julius J. Novack and Harold R. Haberkorn for Appellant.

Helgoe & Hart for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

MOORE, P. J.

The facts of this case are the same as those set forth in our opinion in Security-First National Bank v. Hauer, No. 13125, ante, p. 302 [117 PaCal.2d 952], this day filed. Defendant has attempted to appeal from the judgment entered on January 8, 1941, in favor of plaintiff. That judgment, however, was regularly set aside on defendant's own motion on January 20, 1941. As a result the attempted appeal from that judgment is ineffectual.

The purported appeal from the judgment and order is, therefore, dismissed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.