Blaylock v. Jensen

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 13002. Second Dist., Div. Two. May 16, 1941.]

JOHNNYMAY BLAYLOCK, a Minor, etc., Appellant, v. JAMES JENSEN et al., Defendants; MABEL COATES, Respondent.

COUNSEL

Fred A. Shaeffer and Wilbur D. Garber for Appellant.

Marion A. Smith, D. E. Ruppe and C. W. Bowers for Respondent. [44 Cal. App. 2d 854]

OPINION

WOOD, Acting P. J.

A judgment in the sum of $500 was rendered by the superior court in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Mabel Coates. Thereafter plaintiff filed her memorandum of costs and disbursements and the defendant, objecting to certain items, filed her motion to have the costs taxed by the court. The court made an order striking various items claimed by plaintiff as proper disbursements. From this order plaintiff has appealed.

On a separate appeal, which was prosecuted by defendant from the judgment in plaintiff's favor, we have this day entered an order reversing the judgment for $500. The issue has therefore become moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

McComb, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.