Continental Cas. Co. v. Rizzio Truck Co.

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 26317. Second Dist., Div. Three. June 28, 1963.]

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RIZZIO TRUCK COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

COUNSEL

Weingand, Tipton, Kendig & Stockwell and Eugene L. Stockwell, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hecker, Dunford & Kenealy and Mark R. McKee for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

FILES, J.

Plaintiff's notice of appeal states that plaintiff appeals "from the judgment of the above captioned court sustaining defendants' demurrer to plaintiff's complaint on the 7th day of December, 1961."

The record on appeal contains a minute order dated December 7, 1961, whereby the demurrer of one defendant was sustained with leave to amend within 10 days. There is no judgment. [1] The order sustaining the demurrer is not appealable, and this court has no choice but to dismiss the appeal. (Curnutt v. Holk, 203 Cal. App. 2d 6 [21 Cal. Rptr. 224].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Ford, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.