Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 18608. First Dist., Div. One. Aug. 10, 1959.]

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent, v. ALL PERSONS, Defendants; ESTELLE LATTA et al., Appellants.

COUNSEL

Busick & Busick for Appellants.

Gerald J. O'Gara for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

BRAY, P. J.

Defendant Estelle Latta, purporting to act for herself and others, appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiff.

Except as to the name of the plaintiff, the complaint and answer are identical with those in Universal Land Co. v. All Persons, Number 18579, this day decided (ante, p. 739 [342 P.2d 958]). Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that said answer did not set up a ground of defense and showed laches.

As the questions presented are identical with those in case Number 18579, it is unnecessary to discuss them here. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Wood (Fred B.), J., and Tobriner, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.