Cannon v. Goble (1954)

Annotate this Case
[Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Bernardino.

Civ. A. No. 13. July 28, 1954.]

FRED CANNON, Respondent, v. PEARL GOBLE et al., Appellants.

COUNSEL

C. E. Crowley for Appellants.

Davidson, Bartlett and Walk for Respondent.

OPINION

COUGHLIN, P. J.

This is an action for wages. [1] The record in this case establishes that on July 20, 1952 the appellants filed a request with the trial court that findings be prepared on all of the issues presented for decision. On July 22, 1953 judgment was filed and entered without the making and filing of any findings. This was error (Hardy v. Foster, 125 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 890 [270 P.2d 130]).

The judgment entered herein is reversed with directions to the trial court to proceed to make and file findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Hilliard, J., and Mitchell, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.