California v. Felix
Annotate this CaseDefendant Jovan Felix contended the trial court abused its discretion in his trial for attempted murder by introducing evidence of a prior crime and by denying his motions for retrial and to reopen the evidence. Charges arose from a night of drinking and a fight at a midtown Sacramento bar in August 2013. Defendant was with another man, later identified as Cornelius Jones. Defendant and Jones were tried jointly before separate juries. Jones was convicted of premeditated attempted murder and other serious crimes. However, the court declared a mistrial in defendant’s case. After retrial, a jury found defendant guilty of attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. The court sentenced defendant to a state prison term of 28 years and four months. On appeal of the convictions and sentence, defendant contended the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of an armed robbery he committed with Jones in 1994. He claimed the robbery was too dissimilar to the current crime to be admitted: it was remote in time, it shared no characteristics with the current crime other than the identity of the perpetrators, and it occurred when defendant was a young teenager. Defendant argued that admitting the evidence was prejudicial error. The trial court reached the opposite conclusion than the first trial court which had refused to admit the evidence. Defendant claimed prejudice was shown because the first trial ended in a hung jury without hearing the evidence, yet the jury in the second trial which heard the evidence convicted him. The Court of Appeal found defendant was not convicted "merely because the second court admitted the 1994 robbery evidence." It therefore found admitting the evidence was harmless error, and thus affirmed the second trial conviction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.