People v. Hall
Annotate this CaseReliable hearsay evidence in arrest and probation reports is admissible to prove ineligibility for Proposition 64 -- which reduces or eliminates penalties for marijuana offenses -- relief. The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order denying defendant's application to have his 1996 felony transportation of marijuana conviction dismissed or redesignated as an infraction pursuant to Proposition 64. The court rejected defendant's contention that, in determining his eligibility for the requested relief, the trial court erroneously considered inadmissible hearsay evidence in arrest and probation reports.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.