People v. Rodriguez
Annotate this CaseThe Court of Appeal affirmed defendant's conviction and sentence for attempted murder and other crimes. The court held that the trial court properly admitted defendant's conversation with the informant; the trial court properly instructed the jury that eyewitness certainty should be considered when evaluating eyewitness reliability; there was no cumulative error; defendant forfeited his constitutional arguments challenging his sentence; defendant identified neither procedural shortcoming in his sentencing nor a substantive due process right to a fair sentence; and defendant forfeited his claim under People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.