People v. Anderson
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction and challenged the imposition of fines and fees under People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157. The Court of Appeal held that the trial court properly admitted evidence of defendant stealing the victim's lawn ornaments and his threats against her; the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's request to strike two prior convictions under the Three Strikes law; defendant was entitled to 269 days of presentence custody credit; and defendant forfeited his Dueñas claims. Accordingly, the court modified the trial court's oral pronouncement of judgment to reflect the presentence custody credit, and otherwise affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.