People v. Ramirez
Annotate this CaseThe Court of Appeal affirmed defendant's conviction for a shotgun murder. The court held that there was no instructional error regarding voluntary manslaughter and the trial court propery declined defendant's two special instructions; there was no prosecutorial misconduct; and there was no cumulative error because there were no errors to cumulate. The court also held that defendant's argument concerning firearm enhancements was illogical and invalid; defendant forfeited his ability-to-pay argument; and there was no sentencing error. Finally, the parties and the court agreed that the abstract of judgment must be amended.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.