California v. Trujillo
Annotate this CaseDaylo Trujillo pleaded guilty to attempted robbery and assault by means likely to cause great bodily injury, for which he was sentenced to one year in county jail and three years' formal probation. Trujillo’s appeal of the conviction and sentence centered on an electronics-search probation condition imposed in both cases. He argued the condition was unreasonable under California Supreme Court standards and was constitutionally overbroad. The Court of Appeal found the infringement on Trujillo's privacy rights was outweighed by the state's strong need to closely monitor Trujillo's conduct and protect public safety, and there were no facts showing Trujillo's electronics contain the type of private information meriting heightened protection or that a search of these devices would be more intrusive than a warrantless search of his home, to which Trujillo has not objected. Furthermore, the Court determined the record did not support that the electronics-search condition was unnecessarily broad or would result in an unjustified invasion of Trujillo's privacy rights.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.