People v. Paz
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible sodomy, and related deadly weapon and one-strike allegations after abducting the victim at knifepoint and assaulting her in an isolated parking lot. In the published portion of the opinion, the court held that the sexual penetration element of sodomy requires penetration past the buttocks and into the perianal area, but does not require penetration beyond the perianal folds or anal margin. Therefore, the evidence was sufficient in this case to establish that element. The court affirmed the judgment as modified.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.