People v. Orloff
Annotate this CaseDefendant, confined to a wheelchair, appealed his conviction for making a criminal threat and attempting, by means of a threat, to deter an executive officer from performing his duties. The court concluded that a person confined to a wheelchair is capable of making a criminal threat; the evidence was sufficient to support defendant's convictions; the trial court was not required to sua sponte give an unanimity instruction; defendant failed to carry his burden of showing that there could have been no conceivable reason for trial counsel’s allegedly deficient tactical decisions and, in any event, defendant failed to show prejudice; and the trial court properly admitted evidence of defendant's prior uncharged threats against other persons where the evidence was highly probative, the trial court gave a limiting instruction, and defendant did not object to or request amplification of the instruction. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.