Bankhead v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 4/25/12 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR EMILY BANKHEAD, A131587 & A132985 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG10502243) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] ARVINMERITOR, INC., Defendant and Appellant. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 19, 2012, be modified as follows: 1. On page 3, line 6 of footnote 3, beginning After the trial court entered an amended judgment, the remainder of the sentence is deleted and the words ArvinMeritor and Abex each appealed from the amended judgment, and the resulting appeals were both assigned case number A132985 (the joint appeal) are inserted in its place, so that the full sentence reads as follows: After the trial court entered an amended judgment, ArvinMeritor and Abex each appealed from the amended judgment, and the resulting appeals were both assigned case number A132985 (the joint appeal). 2. On page 3, in the last sentence of footnote 3, beginning A separate opinion, the word Abex s is inserted between the words and and portion ; in the same sentence, the words which has been redesignated as case number A135224 (Order, Apr. 23, 2012, Ruvolo, P.J.) are added following the words joint appeal, so that the last full sentence of footnote 3 reads as follows: 1 A separate opinion will address Abex s separate appeal and Abex s portion of the joint appeal, which has been redesignated as case number A135224 (Order, Apr. 23, 2012, Ruvolo, P. J.). There is no change in the judgment. DATED: _________________________ _______________________________ RUVOLO, P. J. 2 Trial Court: Alameda County Superior Court Trial Judge: Hon. Robert B. Freedman Counsel for Appellant: McKenna, Long & Aldridge, David K. Schultz, Frank K. Berfield, Lisa L. Oberg Counsel for Respondent: Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwood & Harley, James L. Oberman, Gloria C. Amell, Michael T. Stewart A131587 & A132985, Bankhead v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.