Hacienda Ranch Homes v. Super. Ct.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 9/28/11 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- HACIENDA RANCH HOMES, INC., Petitioner, C065978 v. (Super. Ct. No. CV027998) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING Respondent; ROGER ELISSAGARAY et al., Real Parties in Interest. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion certified for partial publication, filed herein on August 30, 2011, be modified as follows: 1 On page 6, add the following as a footnote at the end of the first full paragraph: At the same time the trial court also denied a summary judgment motion which had been filed by the Boersmas, identifying the same triable issues. On page 13, after the first sentence under DISPOSITION, insert the following sentence: Because the order denying the Boersmas motion for summary judgment is the same as the order denying Hacienda s motion, and because the judgment appealed from is so interwoven and connected with the remainder of this case (Estate of McDill (1975) 14 Cal.3d 831, 840), the trial court is directed to vacate its order denying the Boersmas motion for summary judgment and to enter a new order granting the motion and judgment in favor of the Boersmas. These modifications do not change the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied. THE COURT: NICHOLSON , Acting P. J. MAURO , J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.