In re A.C. CA1/3 filed
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 2/28/11 In re A.C. CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE In re A.C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A129752 v. (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. 35890J) A.C., Defendant and Appellant. A.C. appeals a juvenile court dispositional order that placed him in a camp as a condition of probation. Counsel has briefed no issues and asks that we review the record of the proceedings. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) A.C. has not filed a supplemental brief. We have reviewed the record and affirm. DISCUSSION In May 2009, 16-year-old A.C. admitted that he falsely reported to law enforcement that a bomb was hidden at Santa Rosa High School. He was declared a ward of the court and placed on probation. During the following year, he admitted violating the terms of his probation three times, by possessing malt liquor, wearing gang clothing, being suspended from school, failing to complete two programs as ordered, testing positive for marijuana, and cursing at and hanging up the phone on his probation officer. In March 2010, the court imposed community detention, and warned A.C. that further violations could result in removal from his home or being sent to camp. 1 In August 2010, A.C. admitted he violated probation by failing to report for testing, and by possessing gang paraphernalia, a hypodermic syringe, and six rounds of ammunition. He was detained and ordered committed to juvenile hall for 35 to 45 days, to be released to his mother. The following month, A.C. admitted he again violated probation by testing positive for marijuana. The court vacated the order of community detention. A.C. was ordered removed from his home and committed to the departmental commitment program. He was to be detained at juvenile hall pending camp placement, although A.C. said he would rather serve 90 to 120 days in juvenile hall than be in the camp program. A.C. timely appealed. A.C. was represented by counsel during the proceedings, and admitted he violated probation. There was no error in the court s dispositional order. Appellate counsel advised A.C. of his right to file a supplemental brief in this court within 30 days of counsel s opening brief, but no supplemental brief has been filed. Full review of the record reveals no issue that requires further briefing. DISPOSITION The orders of the juvenile court are affirmed. _________________________ Siggins, J. We concur: _________________________ Pollak, Acting P.J. _________________________ Jenkins, J. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
