P. v. Dial
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 11/19/04 Order not previously received for posting CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Glenn) ---- THE PEOPLE, C045211 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 00CR00034) v. LARRY RAY DIAL, SR., Defendant and Appellant. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 3, 2004, be modified as follows: On page 7, after the second sentence of the first paragraph, add the following: Even though addressed to the court, the request shows that defendant sent a copy of it to the District Attorney Office [sic]. We will give defendant the benefit of the doubt and assume, without deciding, that his effort was sufficient to comply with the statute. 1 There is no change in the judgment. SIMS , Acting P.J. NICHOLSON , J. HULL , J. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
