Pokatilov v. State (Majority)

Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed Appellant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with purpose to deliver, for which Appellant was sentenced to five years’ probation and ordered to pay a $5000 fine. The court held (1) the trial court did not err by denying Appellant’s motions for directed verdict; (2) the trial court did not err by failing to give Appellant’s proffered jury instruction regarding constructive possession; and (3) the trial court did not commit clear error in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a search.

Download PDF
Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Jeff Rosenzweig, for appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Amanda Jegley, for appellee.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.