Benton v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of second-degree forgery and theft by receiving. Appellant appealed, arguing that there was insufficient corroboration to support the forgery conviction and insufficient evidence to sustain the theft-by-receiving judgment. The court of appeals affirmed. Appellant subsequently filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus repeating the arguments he raised on appeal. Appellant also argued that the evidence adduced at his trial was insufficient to sustain the convictions, that the trial court erred by denying certain motions and admitting inadmissible evidence, and that the court of appeals erred in affirming the judgment. The circuit court denied the habeas petition. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Petitioner failed to raise a claim within the purview of a habeas petition, and therefore, he failed to demonstrate a basis for the writ to issue.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.