Christopher v. Hobbs
Annotate this CaseAppellant pled guilty to murder in the first degree and was sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. Appellant subsequently filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, arguing, inter alia, that the trial court did not follow proper procedure in taking Appellant's guilty plea to determine whether the plea was voluntarily and intelligently entered, and that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the judgment of first-degree murder. The Supreme Court denied Appellant's motion seeking to have his brief-in-chief duplicated at public expense and dismissed the appeal, holding that because Appellant's claims for relief were not grounds for a writ of habeas corpus, the circuit court did not err in denying the relief sought.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.