Alfonzo Hendrix v. State of Arkansas

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR 07-269 Opinion Delivered ALFONZO HENDRIX Appellant April 24, 2008 PRO SE PETITION FOR REHEARING [CIRCUIT COURT OF NEVADA COUNTY, CR 2004-35, HON. KEITH N. WOOD, JUDGE] v. PETITION DENIED. STATE OF ARKANSAS Appellee PER CURIAM Now before us is appellant’s pro se petition for rehearing. On March 13, 2008, this court affirmed the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1. Hendrix v. State, CR 07-269 (Ark. Mar. 13, 2008) (per curiam). Appellant has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that there was some error of fact or law in the decision that would merit a rehearing pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-3. In the instant petition, appellant reiterates the same grounds advanced in the appeal from the trial court’s decision, and again recites the underlying facts that he contends will support his claim of innocence. A petition for rehearing is not intended to allow the petitioner to merely repeat the arguments already made to the court. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-3(g). In addition, appellant raises new complaints, including an allegation that Rule 37.1 does not provide actual relief to petitioners. New arguments will not be considered in a petition for rehearing. Pannell v. State, 320 Ark. 390, 897 S.W.2d 552 (1995). Petition denied. Gunter, J., not participating.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.