Jerry Perez v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No.
CR07-139
Opinion Delivered:
JERRY PEREZ,
APPELLANT,
MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK
VS.
STATE OF ARKANSAS,
APPELLEE,
GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
Jerry Perez, by his attorney, Troy L. Whitlow, has filed a motion for belated appeal
and for rule on clerk.1
On August 31, 2006, the circuit court entered a judgment and commitment order
convicting Perez of robbery and theft of property and sentencing him to thirty years’
imprisonment for robbery and twenty years’ imprisonment for theft of property.
On
September 28, 2006, Mr. Whitlow filed Perez’s notice of appeal and designation of the
record from the judgment and commitment order. The record in this case was not tendered
until February 12, 2007.
Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure –Civil 5(a) provides, in pertinent part:
(a) When filed. The record on appeal shall be filed with
1
As appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed, we treat the motion as a rule on
clerk rather than a motion for belated appeal. See Bell v. State, ___ Ark ___, ___
S.W.3d___ (Oct. 26, 2006); see also Johnson v. State, 342 Ark. 709, 30 S. W.3d 715
(2000).
the clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and docketed therein
within 90 days from the filing of the first notice of appeal . . . .
This court recently clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for
belated appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said:
Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the
appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely
perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two
options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault
should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself.
There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second,
where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was
not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this
court will decide whether good reason is present.
356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires
an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly
admit fault where he or she has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal.
See id. When it is plain from the motion, affidavits, and record that relief is proper under
either rule based on error or good reason, the relief will be granted.
See id. If there is
attorney error, a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional
Conduct. See id.
It is plain from the motion that there was error on Mr. Whitlow’s part. The language
of Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 5(a) is clear. The time for filing the record may only be extended
by an order of the circuit court. See Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 5(a). There was no such extension
in this case and the record was due to be filed with this court by December 28, 2006.
-2-
CR07-139
Therefore, because the record was tendered after that date, we grant Perez’s motion for rule
on clerk and forward a copy of this opinion to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Granted.
-3-
CR07-139
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
