Wilfredo Gonzalez-Lora v. Circuit Clerk of St. Francis County and Chief Judge, Circuit Court of St. Francis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No.
07-170
Opinion Delivered
WILFREDO GONZALEZ-LORA
Petitioner
April 12, 2007
PRO SE MOTION FOR RETURN OF
TENDERED MATERIAL
v.
CIRCUIT CLERK OF ST. FRANCIS
COUNTY and CHIEF JUDGE, CIRCUIT
COURT OF ST. FRANCIS COUNTY
Respondents
MOTION GRANTED PENDING
SUBMISSION OF FEE FOR
PHOTOCOPYING TENDERED
MATERIAL.
PER CURIAM
Petitioner Wilfredo Gonzalez-Lora tendered to this court a petition for a “Writ of Supervisory
Control,” a pro se original action. After our clerk correctly declined to file the action without a
certified record of the lower court proceedings, petitioner filed a motion for leave to proceed without
the certified record. We treated the motion as a motion for rule on clerk and denied the motion.
Gonzalez-Lora v. Circuit Clerk of St. Francis County, et al, 07-170 (Ark. Feb. 21, 2007) (per
curiam). Now before us is petitioner’s pro se motion asking that the material that he tendered with
the petition for a writ of supervisory control be returned to him. He contends that the material
consisted of original documents for which he has no duplicates.
It is the policy of this court that all tendered material, or in appropriate instances a photocopy
thereof, be retained in the case file. As petitioner avers that he does not have a photocopy of the
material he tendered, we will permit the return of the material upon receipt from petitioner of the
standard fee charged by our clerk of fifty cents per page for photocopying so that a copy can be
retained.
Motion granted pending submission of fee for photocopying tendered material.
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
